HUD has constantly taken the place {that a} landlord can by no means cost pet hire or a pet deposit for a service or help animal.¹ It’s not a place that makes any sense though HUD has held it for a very long time.² In Leslie v. 1125 Hammond, LP, 2023 WL 3858575 (Ga. App. June 7, 2023) the Georgia Court docket of Appeals explains why the place is fallacious:
As an preliminary matter, it seems that Leslie has failed to point out that his requested lodging to waive the pet charges for his canine was “essential to afford him a possibility to make use of and luxuriate in his dwelling.” . . . . A “needed” lodging is one which “alleviates the results of a incapacity,” and a plaintiff should “present, at a minimal, that the lodging affirmatively enhances his high quality of life by ameliorating (or lowering) the results of his incapacity.” . . . . Right here, Leslie’s requested lodging was not itself to have a service canine (as that was apparently already allowed), however he as a substitute requested that Sync Residential waive any related pet charges for the canine. Leslie has not proven that waiving the pet charges would itself “alleviate the impact of his incapacity” any additional than the profit already offered by having the service canine. . . . Leslie has not pointed to proof that he lacks the affordable monetary functionality to pay the pet charges, whether or not due to his incapacity or in any other case.4 . . . Thus, it seems that Leslie has failed to point out that his request to waive the pet charges was essential to accommodate his PTSD.
The Georgia Court docket is just not the primary to make the widespread sense argument that waiver of a pet deposit ought to solely be required whether it is needed for the equal use and pleasure of a dwelling.³ In U.S. v. Barber, 2014 WL 4988200, at *8 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 7, 2014) for instance, the court docket rejected the notion that waiver of a pet deposit was required as a matter of regulation, discovering that whether or not an lodging was needed trusted the information of every case.
The evaluation for waiving pet hire or pet deposits as an lodging is straightforward. An lodging is critical if with out it the tenant can not equally use and luxuriate in their condominium. If everybody else pays a pet deposit then for the disabled tenant to pay a pet deposit is equality, not discrimination. Saying that an help animal is just not a pet is simply phrase play – the owner can name it an animal deposit and the argument disappears. As well as, HUD admits the tenant is required to pay for injury brought on by the animal, which is what a pet deposit and pet hire are presupposed to cowl. If the tenant has to pay for injury why not require the tenant to pay a deposit to cowl future injury? A tenant with an help or service animal might as a matter of reality want an lodging with respect to pet charges, however that can not be stated to be universally true.
It isn’t clear what rationale HUD has for its place. Maybe since 66% of American households embody a pet(4) this simply displays the truth that a majority of HUD’s regulators are pet lovers and might’t think about why landlords desire a deposit within the first place. It’s nearly sure that nobody concerned within the varied non-binding guidances printed by HUD has any expertise with the prices landlords incur when badly behaved pets spoil carpets and sheet rock or with the sensible actuality {that a} landlord merely can not get better losses from a tenant who has already moved out as a result of renters are usually transient and barely possessed of considerable belongings which can be topic to execution.
Most essential although, HUD can not appear to know the truth that treating these with disabilities as if they’re, by definition, incapable of paying pet charges that these with out disabilities routinely pay, is the worst sort of insult. These with disabilities may have lodging instantly associated to their incapacity, however they don’t must be handled like helpless youngsters who’re unable to handle strange monetary obligations like pet hire and pet deposits. Treating these with disabilities as equals means beginning with the idea that they’re equal in each respect besides their particular incapacity. The “no pet price” rule does precisely the other.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
¹ The newest formal assertion in present in FHEO 2020-1, “Assessing a Particular person’s Request to Have an Animal as a Affordable Lodging Beneath the Truthful Housing Act.”
² See, Joint Assertion of the Division of Housing and City Growth and the Division of Justice, Affordable Lodging Beneath the Truthful Housing Act (“Joint Assertion”), Q and A 11 (Might 17, 2004),
³ See my weblog: Unconventional knowledge regarding pet deposits below the Truthful Housing Act.
(4) See, Forbes, Pet Possession Statistics and Information in 2023.
